Get independent review of your research before it goes out
Formal peer review is slow, and internal review is not independent. Scrutinizr lets you check figures automatically and invite subject experts to review methods and claims, with findings linked to the exact passage.
Why this is hard today
Guesswork
Errors in figures are found after publication.
Wrong signal
Colleagues share the same blind spots.
Slow answers
Review comments are scattered across email.
How Scrutinizr does it
- 01
Upload the draft
Paper, report or slides, plus datasets behind the figures.
- 02
Automatic checks
Counts, sums and means are reproduced; references are looked up.
- 03
Expert reviewers
Invite experts in your field or choose from the network.
- 04
Respond and sign off
Authors respond to each finding; reviewers accept or reject with a reason.
The result
- Reproduced figures with any differences
- Reference checks
- Expert findings linked to passages
- A review record you can share
Example: a policy report
The automatic check found a sample size that differed between a table and the text. An external statistician flagged a missing confidence interval. Both were fixed before launch.
Good to know.
Does this replace journal peer review?
No. It helps you submit or publish with fewer errors.
Can I bring my own reviewers?
Yes. Invite them by email to a team review.
Is the draft confidential?
Yes. It stays private to your workspace and invited reviewers.
Make your next move with evidence.
Start with a question and bring your websites, documents, data and customer voices into one evidence trail.